Let me first recap the first
experiment (found here): I compared three bottles of Ardbeg 10
- one I slowly
drank at a normal pace
- one opened and then placed under vacuum
- and one unopened bottle. After I had drank through most of the first bottle, I did a blind tasting of the three samples and found that the one held
under vacuum was best, while the one I drank slowly was my least favorite. The conclusion was that keeping a
bottle under vacuum is the way to go.
Sooo.... I started keeping my Ardbeg under vacuum between pours.
But... wait a minute... before each drink I broke the vacuum.... which meant I broke the vacuum a lot... and this isn't what I tested. The entire idea of keeping a bottle under
vacuum is so that the oxygen in the air won’t interact with the whisky. But does it negate the effect if you keep
introducing air to the bottle every time you break the vacuum?
So... what I need to do is an experiment to
check drinking a bottle held under vacuum in real world conditions where I will
open and close a bottle rather often.
And the result is... storing a bottle of whisky under vacuum between pours does not change the whisky. Read on for all the details!
Procedure
1) Split a bottle of whisky into
two separate, preferably identical bottles.
In this case I split the remaining Ardbeg 10 (about 1 bottles worth) into two bottles
putting roughly 2/3 into one and 1/3 into the other.
2) Replace the cork of one bottle
with a vacuum stopper. Evacuate the air
in the bottle with the vaccum stopper.
3) Drink through the corked bottle at my normal pace. Every time the corked bottle is opened for a pour, break the vacuum on the other bottle, tilt it as if pouring, and then re-evacuate. In other words, pretend you are taking a pour of of the bottle held under vacuum.
Results
It took me about 7 months to drink the vacuumed bottle down to the same level as the corked bottle. At the time of judgement, I had my wife pour
a friend and I blind samples. I didn't tell my friend what he was drinking, only that I was doing an experiment with an Islay whisky and wanted
his honest comparison of the two.
The
results were exciting!
The two samples were (virtually) identical.
We had a hard time trying to find any
differences between the two - such a hard time I had to ask my wife if she poured me two identical samples (she’s done that before to keep me really honest). The Ardbeg stored under vacuum had a tad more sweetness
on the nose and was ever so slightly smoother.
The negligible differences were only detectable because we were drinking
the samples side-by-side and knew they were somehow “different”. Let me try to give you an idea of how
negligible… I would say the magnitude of the differences is about the same as
the difference between two full bottles with a few drops of water added to one
of the bottles.
So when I said the
results were exciting, I guess I really meant they were exciting in a geeky whiskynerd
kind of way.
OK, so holding a peated whisky
under vacuum while drinking through the bottle doesn’t help maintain flavor.
But what about a non-peated speyside?
I simultaneously conducted the experiment on a bottle of Glenmorangie
the Tayne.
Nope. The two samples of Glenmorangie were the same
too.
Conclusions
First, my overall conclusion with
this experiment is what everyone else has already said: If you store your whisky
upright out of direct light and at a relatively constant room temperature, then there is no need for anything fancy.
But why? Why doesn’t the whisky profile change? Here's my hypothesis: When the bottle held under vacuum is opened the surface of the liquid is
oxidized nearly instantaneously after coming into contact with air. If you
are relatively gentle with your bottle the surface will remain constant and will mix very little with the volume when you pour it. Similarly, the same will occur with an unevacuated bottle. The surface will oxide but if the bottle is stored stationary and handled gently when poured, then the surface liquid will mix very little with the volume. Therefore, holding a bottle under
vacuum between pours has no affect on the characteristics of the whisky.
Finally, it looks like I jumped the gun on ordering vacuum stoppers. Anyone want one? They've never been used and stored in a smoke-free house and are free to a good home. (Update: The stoppers were lost when we moved!)
No comments:
Post a Comment